SIMPLE J. Rosenberg
Internet-Draft dynamicsoft
Expires: January 17, 2005 July 19, 2004
An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Representation for Expressing
Presence Policy Capabilities
draft-rosenberg-simple-pres-policy-caps-01
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
RFC 3668.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 17, 2005.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
An important component of presence services is policy. Policy
systems allow the presentity to grant access to specific pieces of
information to specific watchers. To allow for interoperability
between clients which set such policies, and servers which execute
them, it is necessary for clients to be able to determine the
capabilities of the server to which it is connected. This
specification defines a set of Extensible Markup Language (XML)
elements for expressing presence policy capabilities.
Rosenberg Expires January 17, 2005 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Presence Policy Capabilities July 2004
Table of Contents
1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Structure of Presence Policy Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. XML Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Example Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7.1 URN Sub-Namespace Registrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7.2 XML Schema Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.1 Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.2 Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 7
Rosenberg Expires January 17, 2005 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Presence Policy Capabilities July 2004
1. Terminology
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
"SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [3] and
indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations.
2. Introduction
An important component of presence [5] is policy. Policy systems
allow the presentity to grant access to specific pieces of
information to specific watchers. These policy systems can be
extremely simple or extremely complex. For this reason [1] defines a
generic Extensible Markup Language (XML) based format for
representing policy capabilities. That format applies to many
services, including location and presence. This specification
extends that one by defining policy capabilities specific to
presence. Those policy capabilities correspond to the conditions,
actions and transformations defined in [2].
3. Structure of Presence Policy Capabilities
[1] defines the structure of common policy capability documents. In
that specification, each policy capability document has three
components - a list of supported conditions, a list of supported
actions, and a list of supported transformations. This specification
merely extends that document with the conditions, actions and
transformations defined in [2]. It does so by defining six empty
elements - "anonymous", "accept-subscription", "provide-presence",
"show-namespace", "show-tuple", "show-element" - each of which
indicates whether the respective attribute in [2] is supported. All
of these elements are defined within the namespace:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:supported-pres-permissions
Rosenberg Expires January 17, 2005 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Presence Policy Capabilities July 2004
4. XML Schema
See RFCXXXX.
END 7.2 XML Schema Registration This section registers an XML schema as per the procedures in [4]. Rosenberg Expires January 17, 2005 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Presence Policy Capabilities July 2004 URI: please assign. Registrant Contact: IETF, SIMPLE working group, (simple@ietf.org), Jonathan Rosenberg (jdrosen@jdrosen.net). The XML for this schema can be found as the sole content of Section 4. 8. References 8.1 Normative References [1] Rosenberg, J., "An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Representation for Expressing Policy Capabilities", draft-rosenberg-simple-common-policy-caps-00 (work in progress), February 2004. [2] Rosenberg, J., "Presence Authorization Rules", draft-rosenberg-simple-rules-00 (work in progress), February 2004. [3] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [4] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. 8.2 Informative References [5] Day, M., Rosenberg, J. and H. Sugano, "A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging", RFC 2778, February 2000. Author's Address Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft 600 Lanidex Plaza Parsippany, NJ 07054 US Phone: +1 973 952-5000 EMail: jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com URI: http://www.jdrosen.net Rosenberg Expires January 17, 2005 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Presence Policy Capabilities July 2004 Intellectual Property Statement The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Disclaimer of Validity This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. Acknowledgment Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. Rosenberg Expires January 17, 2005 [Page 7]