CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_


Reported by Bernhard Stockman/EBONE

Minutes of the Operational Statistics Working Group (OPSTAT)

Agenda


   o RFC1404 Deployment Experience
   o Client/Server Protocol:  Presentation by ANS
   o Statistical MIB


RFC1404 Deployment Experience

Daniel Karrenberg reported that the efforts to convert MONSTER to use
RFC1404 have not progressed.  Due to resource constraints further
development of MONSTER has been put on indefinite hold.  What would be
needed to make it use RFC1404 is just a relatively simple reformatter.
Further it could need a rewrite of the actual SNMP polling function
since this uses the snmp capable awk from ISODE which is very hard to
install.  Daniel renewed his offer to get started, those people who are
interested in continuing work on Monster.

Craig Haney who was not present at the Working Group meeting has a PERL
parser for the RFC1404 format.

A list of problems were reported with RFC1404:


   o In the syntax for device-fields multiple tag-tables are not
     delimited syntactically.  Proposed solutions:

      -  Count preceding
      -  Different field separator withing tag-table
      -  Bracketing tag-table with something BEGIN-TAGT, END-TAGT
      -  Bracketing with


The Group decided to use s around tag-table.  This will lead to a
revision of the BNF:


    device-section ::= "BEGIN_DEVICE" <FS>
                      <device-field> <FS>
                      "END_DEVICE"

    device-field   ::= <networkname><FS><routername><FS><linkname><FS>
                      <bw-value><FS><bw-sort><FS><proto-type><FS>
                      <proto-addr><FS><time-zone><FS> "{" <tag-table> "}"

                                   1





                      [ "{" <tag-table> "}" ]


Action:  Bernhard volunteered to check for similar problems and report
via mail.

After the discussion the Group decided to collect more problem reports
from implementors before trying to issue another RFC.

There IS interest in USING tools following the RFC out there.  There is
not much interest in actually producing the tools.  FARNET (who?)  might
produce some funding for developing PD tools.  Question:  Who would be
interested?  No immediate interest.

Action:  Bernhard will send a message to the list about this and try to
find capable implementors.  Anyone interested persons should contact
Bernhard.

Client/Server Protocol

The intention is to make (aggregated) statistical information available
from a server.  A strawman document is being developed.  The following
reports were given:


   o Henry Clark reported on implementation experience.  Login is
     primitive direct string comparison.  Separate configuration file
     defining the view of the users.  Server runs use psi formant but
     don't use opstat.

   o Ittai Herhman reported on a similar system currently being used at
     ANS which originated at Merit.  Refer to slides.

   o Vikas Aggarwal also showed some examples of reports.  Both Vikas
     and Ittai remarked that from limited experiments they have done it
     seems that for line utilisation there is little difference between
     15 minute and 1 minute sampling.  A preliminary document is being
     done.


The Group went into architectural brainstorm mode and reached the
following conclusions:


   o There is agreement to generalise the authorisation passed by login
     to generic authentication strings and leave in the authentication
     method used as a local matter beyond the scope.

   o Select shouldn't return the data, there should be a separate "get"
     command to initiate that, multiple selections are possible and
     identified by a selection ID which can be specified by client and
     will be returned by server.

                                   2





   o Status command to find out status of what is currently selected
     especially the amount of data.


Action:  Bernhard Stockman will change the strawman accordingly.

Statistical MIB

Consensus is that a short list of HIGLY DESIRABLE variables should be
agreed upon and forwarded to the ??  WG for inclusion in the next
Internet Standard MIB.

Action:  Bernhard will forward a list of all so far proposed variables
to the list and re-start discussion.

Attendees

Vikas Aggarwal           aggarwal@jvnc.net
David Bolen              db3l@ans.net
Erik-Jan Bos             erik-jan.bos@surfnet.nl
Rebecca Bostwick         bostwick@es.net
Douglas Carson           carson@utcc.utoronto.ca
James Cassell            jcassell@dsac.dla.mil
Henry Clark              henryc@oar.net
David Conrad             davidc@iij.ad.jp
Roger Fajman             raf@cu.nih.gov
Stefan Fassbender        stf@easi.net
Dale Finkelson           dmf@westie.mid.net
Eric Fleischman          ericf@act.boeing.com
Paul Franchois           paulf@bldrdoc.gov
Kenneth Goodwin          goodwin@a.psc.edu
Ittai Hershman           ittai@ans.net
Daniel Karrenberg        daniel@ripe.net
Kim Long                 klong@sura.net
David Lovering           lovering@bldrdoc.gov
Daniel McRobb            dwm@noc.ans.net
Greg Minshall            minshall@wc.novell.com
Bob Morgan               morgan@networking.stanford.edu
Marsha Perrott           mlp+@andrew.cmu.edu
Robert Reschly           reschly@brl.mil
Steven Richardson        sjr@merit.edu
Vilson Sarto             vilson@fapq.fapesp.br
Richard Woundy           rwoundy@vnet.ibm.com



                                   3